DesignScan #1944
Scanned 21 October 2026
designscan.me
Your site is fast, well found, accessible, light on images and technically sound. Verdict: looking good: polish, don’t rebuild.
Feels like 2021 1 UX findings, 0 critical 0.9 MB · 9 files
Was 59 in 2017 · +34
Looking good: polish, don’t rebuild
DesignGood
AgeNeeds work
SpeedGood
SEOGood
ImagesGood
CodeGood
UXGood
Access.Good
PeopleNeeds 3 votes
How it looks on every screen
Website Age: feels like 2021
Visitors today expect 2024 or newerBootstrap (old)
2014
2014
Modern CSS (grid, variables)
2021
2021
Biggest giveaway: Bootstrap (old) (2014).
UX Doctor: diagnosis & prescription
Sorted by impact on your score
Minor
The menu has 26 links
Rx: Group the menu into 5–7 main items; move the rest to the footer.
AllEffort MediumGain +1
Speed
TTFB server response0.03 s
Weight whole page0.9 MB
Core Web Vitals appear here when the PageSpeed key is configured.
SEO & findability
✓Page title (40 characters)
✓Meta description
✓One main heading (H1)
✓Search engines may index this page
✓Sitemap found
✓Structured data present
✓AI crawlers may read the site
✓Secure https
The people’s verdict
0 community votes · Board of Three counted 5×
No votes yet. Be the first to vote.
LAYER 2 · NOT CONNECTED YET
See what your real visitors do
Install GhostStat (one line, no cookies), and this report adds heatmaps, rage clicks, drop-off pages and intent scores from your real visitors.
Connect GhostStat, freeHeatmaps, recordings and funnels appear here after your first visitors arrive.
Want someone to fix it?
Open this report to designers and developers. They see the fix list and pitch with a price. You choose, and nobody gets your email until you do.